Rove Is Innocent It Was All A Mistake By Fitzgerald
Ya right. We are supposed to believe this crap from CNN that it was all a misunderstanding and a mistake on Fitzgerald's part.Now it really comes down to, when all is said and done, a question of who said what to whom when. And the who is very important because we're being told by a variety of sources that the special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, was planning to indict Karl Rove for misrepresenting during the investigation an interview comments that he had made to a reporter. However, there was a key conversation, sources say, and there may have been a misunderstanding by the special prosecutor that a conversation that he was attributing to Rove with Viveca Novak of "Time Magazine" may, in fact, have really been held by Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin.Nothing but spin on Luskin's part. I hardly believe that someone with a reputation of being scrupulously meticulous in his investigations would mistake testimony from Rove saying he had a conversation with Viveca Novak when it was really his attorney she had spoken with. What hogwash. As is stated at the blog firedoglake I am hearing through sources that the Franken story is crap, 100% spin. Fitzgerald is supposedly busy right now dealing with Bob Woodward, who may have earned himself a trip to the grand jury next week for his efforts, and with Woodward's source, whoever that may turn out to be. Only then will he start dealing with Viveca Novak, and the "Fitzgerald made a mistake" rumor is pure bullshit. And nobody at this point is buying the story that Luskin himself is going in to testify.Just because they say it was a mistake doesn't make it so, and the sooner Rove and his lapdog attorney realize it the better. Rove is going down, of that I have no doubt and the air is coming out of his over-inflated ego more and more with each story they spin. |
Comments on "Rove Is Innocent It Was All A Mistake By Fitzgerald"