More Questions For Rove From O'Donnell

Lawrence O'Donnell is certainly keeping the heat on Karl Rove and his lackey of an attorney. Via The Huffington Post I have a call in to Bob Luskin, Karl Rove’s lawyer, but I’m not holding my breath for a call back. He knows I know too much, since I broke the story last week that his client is one of the secret sources Matt Cooper has been protecting for the last two years. I have three questions for Luskin: Q: You’ve said Rove is not a target of the investigation. Is he a subject of the investigation? Q: Since Time delivered its e-mails to the prosecutor on Friday, have you asked the prosecutor whether Rove’s status has changed? From witness to subject? Or subject to target? Q: You told Newsweek that your client “never knowingly disclosed classified information.” Did Rove ever unknowingly disclose classified information? [snip[ I have no problem with Luskin reading my questions here before he gets on the phone with me or any of the reporters he has already been willing to talk to. These aren’t the kinds of questions you can easily fudge the answers to. I would never waste a lawyers’ time with one of those. All I need is a yes or no. Won’t take a minute. C'mon Karl fess up. It's time for both you and your mouthpiece to come clean or are you both dodging straightforward questions because suddenly the "House of Karl's Kards" is beginning to crumble and you know it? There is much more worth reading in the article by O'Donnell including explanations about exactly what is meant by "subject" "target" and a mere "witness". MORE.....