Statements From NY Times & Miller
Editor & Publisher has obtained the statements from Sulzberger, Keller, Miller on her release.According to the Times, I. Lewis Libby "had made clear that he genuinely wanted her to testify," and gave her a waiver on their confidential conversations. But the Times account tonight revealed that Libby and his lawyers said he had given his waiver a year ago--and then again two weeks ago--but Miller did not accept it. She was released today after she and her lawyers met at the jail with Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor in the case, to discuss her testimony, the Times revealed.I can't help but wonder what was agreed to between Miller and Prosecutor Fitzgerald especially in light of this portion of her statement.. "My attorneys have also reached agreement with the Office of Special Counsel regarding the nature and scope of my testimony." Just what is it Miss Judy will not be testifying to tomorrow? My speculation is that she has been excused from testifying to anything that may implicate herself in the investigation. Then she gives up Rove in return for this concession from Fitzgerald. Well come on, I can at least hope can't I? You can read all three statements HERE... |
Comments on "Statements From NY Times & Miller"